Translate

Diversification-Friendly Attitudes

I believe that emotions, perhaps, come to be exactly when one's beliefs are into being contradictory  -  so as to form thesis and antithesis for each other. To the extent the feelings are into truth as a worth, they are often used for finding a synthesis of truth from the thesis and antithesis. They can also be used in order to find a neutrality between those two opposites. This is, to the extent it's so, thanks much to that they can be anchored to truthfulness, which if genuine provides such a tendency for truthful synthesis. The truth of anchorage might very often, though, be more or less corrupt, meaning that it is influenced by something that provides so-to-speak meaning negligence, thereby giving birth to illusions and/or lies, which cannot always be defined (at least not easily) as such. Because doing that is to be insinuating lies.

But lies can also be insinuated by ruling over heterogeneity of interpretation  -  or even by plainly counteracting it. This is because (more or less unlike heterogeneity of cause, which is simpler and described here), the heterogeneity of interpretation is not automatically into too much modesty for it to hinder that it is ruled over ... Thus we have a delicate balance about it and between its thesis and antithesis.

I believe eight can represent the basis for feelings (for my logical reason to define it as such, see here). For feelings to pertain to intuition, one needs to let there be sympathy to them, which is usual. Because sympathy can find its way into emotions by the soul, because the soul is of sympathy, and sympathy is wholly clear on what emotions can be about, since it is also into two times four, though with the four ingratiating the two, and thus forestalling (I think one can call it) emotions by  the power of anticipation.
 
In this context (and to some extent otherwise), it is an eight that is the heterogeneity that provides emotions by tendencies abstraction and so. Such abstraction can obscure destiny enough so that there is not (to the extent feelings rule) any smart way of knowing what its rule will be. That is, I believe that it is one's feelings that provide very similar to what many scholars (such as Haberman, Rawls and others have defined the Veil of Ignorance. But the veil of ignorance caused by feelings also manifests that destiny, I think. See also here.)

A seventeen is a total meaning step upon eight. it provides care for what an eight stands for in that sense. This means that the seventeen stands for a combined perspective of the two, which entwines them into one. That is thesis, so to speak, and antithesis, are entwined so that presenting one also presents the other. Such presentation creates associations that would be impossible if they were to be absolute, either one of those perspectives. ...  Together, I believe, this can stand for the essence of the basic creativity and imagination we might have, (and thus perhaps even of the right hemisphere of our brain structure; for further reading, see also here. For more about art, see here.)

A ten is a partial meaning step upon eight. It provides one levels of meaning for each of the opposite perspectives, each of which is into one level of care for it. This partial meaning step thereby turns each of the beliefs (that constitute the thesis and antithesis), which as described above together form feelings and so, into a spirit of belief instead. This, in turn, yields that the beliefs are no longer temporary entities, but rather entities of personality. that is, when one person tries to establish contact with another, at least if they are strangers with each other, there's probably (perhaps always) something of a ten (or something that builds upon it) in that one side of the contact pertains to one five, and the other to another.

A twenty-three creates one level of meaning for what ten stands for. Twenty-three stands for that interpersonal relationships build up that understanding should be based on interpersonal relationships. Also it specifies about tolerance per se. My gut feeling is that it's about conspiracy with deviants or so.

By the way, a seventeen specifies what I call spirit, per se. This also means that the spirit of specification is changed so that an anchorage for it also needs to be into specification for being good enough for providing the consistency that is needed for the added intensity that anchorage can provide.

A fourteen provides two opposing perspectives both of which can represent the other as an absolute initiative of a totally different stands about reality. A forty-one creates one care level of support for such a combination. These must even less than the ten and twenty-three mentioned above stand for creativity. Even so it stands for deep interpersonal relations that are based more or less on sympathy, which is, however, not necessarily sympathy mostly for the partner one relates mostly to, though it usually, I guess, tends to be into that. Also, the deep interpersonal relationships don't always tend to relate back very much to the sympathy that it can be based on.

A twenty-six provides two opposing perspectives of sophisticated notions of what one means by being a match for an opposite. This provides the type of decisive subjectivity that chivalrous attitudes might stand for is moral, thereby providing way for courting and perhaps marriage in a traditional sense. Those are one support level upon twenty-six (i.e. they are of ninety-seven), and thus usually provides for viewing such romance as more important than conspiring and so, I guess, since ninety-seven specifies about twenty-three.

Both twenty-six-based, and to much extent also forty-one-based feelings, can become obsessed with selfish greed, and thereby become dangerous. This is very much due to that twenty-nine and support of it can posses either or both of them, sometimes (with or without it being slyly emphasised in a way that withstands well an eight, which it doesn't always need, since it conquer the eight). Moreover support for twenty-nine can also cooperate with (be what I have called anchored by) both or either one of them, respectively. Possession of either one of those counteracts for example relating to the opposite gender, thereby tending to cause unstable subjectivity, and thereby oftentimes instability about relations with those different, for example the opposite gender. This can be counteracted at least somewhat well by focusing on homogeneity for a  -  more or less good, usually  -  legitimization of subjectivity. There is not an absolute solution in doing so, but still tending to do so is very often the solution that is at hand for those who choose to be into subjectivity that is stronger than one can preform otherwise. For that one may  -  for example  -  relate to the same gender in order to compensate for lack of capability and/or opportunity to relate well with the opposite gender. ...

Anyway (as is described in more detail if one follows that opposite-gender link above), about both that and similar such aspirations that might be about readiness for sexual lust, it is basically masculinely into heterogeneity to use forty one for seeing to it that there can be tranquility to a relationship. It is femininely into heterogeneity to do it with twenty-six. Both are inclined for thus pertaining to heterosexuality Either of those heterosexualities should thereby be associated with general care for multitude and so, I think. See also here. Otherwise it's more likely to be of heterogeneous attitudes only for selfish reasons, I believe.

Anyway, a seventy-four (two times thirty-seven, which is the next meaning level upon thirteen) provides of two opposing four-level perspectives. Such forth level thinking is into control over one's potential to be into having an antithesis for one's notions. In numbers this has to do with that thirty-seven specifies ten, the double of five, which is thereby a prelude of the double of thirty-seven. The thirty-seven can thereby avoid the broken oneness to its establishment of itself that would be otherwise due to the discrimination of a two factor.

But, I believe, twoish discrimination can become integrated with the influences of a thirty-seven in fatal enough ways to cause an incompletion of that thirty-seven's influences of the above-described type. When that happens, a certain fatal mentality comes to be. Such a mentality is not generally accepted in modern human beings, at least. They thereby rarely, at least among humans, I think, reach very much power. Even most tyrannies are not quit into such thinking. One exception however to this is the rule of Stalinism. ... For some reason something tells me that Lavrentiy Beria, his head of secret police, is the one who would have even worsened its grip on humanity. --- It might, though, reach some limited power when certain types of psychopathic people rule over interest groups. Those with who need interest groups for criminals and/or mentally ill I believe risk very much being ruled, at times, by such wanglers.

The sadism of two times 151 (the meaning level right after thirty-seven), however, is total about destructiveness, so that it can't even serve evil people. ... In that it is that, twice those meaning levels that follow also pertain to so destructive tendencies that they are not about that evil may gain victory. Instead they all pertain to destructiveness  -  which is very much a different problem!

But with thirty-seven, 151 and those values (or complexity levels of the classifications of interest, as one might say) that follow those, are when not so evil and/or destructive subjective, I guess, about Godliness and so. Either way, I don't feel that I should try to figure them out, even! ...

No comments:

Post a Comment