But there are other systems of ethics that do the above, I think. The difference seems to me to be that at the same time religions are also built upon emphasis-type seduction.But this type of seduction is probably only in the background, in the sense that it's what has established them to become popular in the sense they are. In the spirit of the religions themselves, that seduction is hardly appreciated (at least nowadays, I think). Instead there is a focus on their functionality for trustworthiness, as described above.
There are in the largest religions some examples of this, I think:
- Christianity is the way I see it the most influential
religion in this world. It is based on Judaism (which I will discuss
later), a member of which tried, I think, to alter. But rather than
altering his own religion he started a new one. Why, one might ask.
My answer to that is that it is because he invented a soul
beneficiary system of altruism for the sake of a soul, in which
memory is spared from much criticism if it is inclined for such
Later, it seems, probably about 500 AD or so, someone faked that such altruism should be influenced by a soul beneficiary system that indulges in exploiting utilitarian notions and thoughts for rendering soul ambition be self-sufficiently adequate for supremacy. In this the new religion turned against the Judaism from which it had sprung. Or the infiltration was perhaps earlier than I first thought, for example by roman emperor Constantine, as described here. Either way, I suspect, but I'm not sure, that those who believe very much in that form of Christianity are the Illuminati - Right?!?
- Because Judaism is, I believe, about one or two things. The
very most basic one of them seems to be to have it utilitarianism
aught to be of cunning that can sort out evils to be exploited for
the benefit of (at least seemingly) everyone. But, my guess is with
Moses or so, there came to it another soul beneficiary thought to
it. This one seems to be about scrutinizing the spirit with
remediation that leads to more remediation of it. This often - though not necessarily - renders a spirit be more or less altruistic.
- Islam I believe to be about scrutinizing, to some extent,
about one or both of Christianity's two soul beneficiary systems,
for the sake of also scrutinizing against clarity on how evil could
- Buddhims seems to be about letting utilitarianism exploit
itself so that it can avoid being exploited by evil or so, in that
it very much seems to lead to that utilitarianism has a notion of
altruism to it.
- Hindusim, from which Buddhism has sprung, seems to me to be
about rendering utilitarianism self-sufficient about pertaining to